Model Design by Kelly Emrick, DHSc, PhD, MBA
Enterprise health index
78/100
▲ +3 vs last week
Active alerts
12Risk heatmap
Sites × domains
Low
Medium
High
Data input studio
Enter site and modality data, then refresh the dashboard modelUse the editable table below to replace the demo data with your own operational data. Each row represents a site and modality combination. The model recalculates volume, financial, quality, staffing, patient, equipment, turnaround time, and referral summary views from these entries. Data is saved locally in this browser and can be exported or imported as JSON.
Editable operational dataset
Site level model inputs| Site | Modality | Volume | Net Rev $M | Margin % | Cost/Exam | A/R Days | Peer Rev % | Safety Events | Vacant FTE | Engagement | NPS | Avg Wait | Util % | Uptime % | Routine TAT | SLA % | Market Share |
|---|
Total volume MTD
127,442
▲ 12.4% YoY
Slot utilization
87.3%
▲ 2.1 vs target
No-show rate
4.1%
▲ 0.4 vs target
Schedule lead time
6.3 d
▼ 1.2 d MoM
Daily volume — historical and 90-day forecast
Historical
Forecast
80% CI
Anomaly
Volume by modality
MTD shareVolume by site
Top 6 of 16Site × modality drill-down
Click row to drill| Site | CT | MR | XR | US | Mammo | Total | vs Forecast |
|---|
Net revenue MTD
$24.8M
▲ 9.2% YoY
Contribution margin
38.4%
▲ 1.6 pts
Cost per exam
$112
▼ $4 MoM
A/R days
42.6
▲ 1.8 d
Net revenue — historical and 12-month forecast
Actual
Forecast
80% CI
Payer mix
% of net revenueContribution margin by modality
$ per examA/R aging
$ outstandingDenial reasons
Last 90 daysSite financial performance
Click row to drill| Site | Net Rev | Margin % | Cost/Exam | A/R Days | vs Budget |
|---|
Peer review concordance
94.2%
▲ 0.8 pts QoQ
Critical findings comm.
98.6%
▲ 0.4 pts
Safety events / 10k exams
2.1
▼ 0.3 MoM
Repeat / reject rate
3.8%
▲ 0.2 pts
Peer review concordance — 12-month trend
Concordance
Anomaly
Safety events by category
Last 90 daysPatient radiation dose
Avg DLP, CT examsACR accreditation status by site
Modality coverageSite quality scorecard
Click row to drill| Site | Peer Review | Crit Findings | Safety Events | Repeat % | Composite |
|---|
RVU per radiologist FTE
8,940
▲ 4.2% YoY
Tech RVU per FTE
3,240
▲ 2.8% YoY
Vacancy rate
9.4%
▲ 1.2 pts
Engagement score
76
▲ 4 pts
Staffing demand forecast — 12 months
Current FTE
Projected demand
Gap
Productivity vs MGMA benchmarks
Percentile by roleVacancy & turnover trend
12-monthEngagement drivers
Pulse survey themesBurnout watchlist
Composite risk scoreSite staff scorecard
Click row to drill| Site | Vacant FTE | Turnover | RVU / FTE | Engagement | Time to Fill |
|---|
Press Ganey percentile
87th
▲ 4 pts QoQ
Net Promoter Score
72
▲ 3 pts
Avg wait (check-in to scan)
14 min
▼ 2 min
Complaint rate / 10k
2.4
▼ 0.6 MoM
Press Ganey — 12-month trend
Percentile
Anomaly
Wait time distribution
Check-in to scan, MTDComplaint themes
Top categories MTDSite experience scorecard
Click row to drill| Site | Press Ganey | NPS | Avg Wait | Complaints | Schedule Lead |
|---|
Modality utilization
82.6%
▲ 1.8 pts
Uptime
98.4%
▲ 0.3 pts
Avg scan time vs target
+6%
▲ 1 pt
Scanners ≥ 8 yrs
14
of 64 total
Modality utilization — daily, last 90 days
Utilization %
Forecast
Anomaly
Scanner age distribution
Years in serviceDowntime causes
Hours, last 90 days10-year capacity & replacement plan
Demand vs installed capacityScanner inventory & replacement schedule
Click row to drill| Site | Modality | Make/Model | Age (yr) | Util % | Uptime | Replace |
|---|
STAT TAT median
28 min
▼ 4 min
Routine TAT median
3.2 hr
▲ 0.4 hr
SLA compliance
94.6%
▲ 1.2 pts
Addendum rate
2.8%
▼ 0.3 pts
TAT trend by priority — last 90 days
STAT
Routine
Anomaly
TAT median by modality
Routine readsSLA misses by hour-of-day
Coverage gap signalSubspecialty coverage
% reads with subspecialistRead-to-sign distribution
Time gap, MTDSite TAT scorecard
Click row to drill| Site | STAT | Routine | SLA % | Addendum % | Coverage Gap |
|---|
Active referrers
847
▲ 28 MoM
Referrer retention
88.4%
▲ 2.1 pts
Volume per referrer
42
▲ 4 MoM
Estimated leakage
12.6%
▲ 0.8 pts
Referrer pipeline funnel
Last 12 monthsNew referrer acquisition
12-month trendSpecialty mix
% of total volumeTop 10 referrers by volume
MTDAt-risk referrers
Volume drop ≥ 30% MoMMarket share by ZIP
Click row to drill into referrer detail| ZIP | Primary site | Population | Imaging market | Our share | Leakage | Trend |
|---|